The Daily Telegraph in 1900: The Leading Article
Arthur H. Beavan made a brief survey of the journalism in Imperial London, published in 1901, here describing how a leading article is produced:
People have rather vague ideas about a leading article.
They imagine it can be run off as easily as a very long letter of, say, some 1500
to 2000 words; but I think they would be hard put to it if called upon, without
previous notice, to sit down and compose in faultless English, a leader upon some
incident, political or otherwise, to which they had not given any special attention
or study.
This is what frequently happens.
At a late hour, perhaps, a telegram arrives of national importance, and an article
is forthwith evolved, hissing hot from the brain of the best writer the journal
possesses. In a word, a successful leader-writer requires experience which only years
can give, besides great powers of concentration, a most retentive memory, and
the facility, the knack, of writing eloquently and interestingly, so as to be
understood of all.
Let us imagine then that Sir Edwin has finished his task.
He now summons a messenger, who returns in a wonderfully short time with the proofs.
These are corrected, a revise is sent up by the printer, is looked over, found
to be "clean," and Sir Edwin Arnold's toil for the night is over.
Next: Journalims in 1900 London: The Daily Telegraph: Correspondents |