St Paul's Cathedral in 1900 London
In Imperial London, 1901, Arthur H. Beavan describes St Paul's Cathedral:
The metropolitan cathedral sharply contrasts with Westminster
Abbey.
It attracts many by the grandeur of its exterior; but by the few, its Italian
renaissance architecture is deplored as a mistake, unsuited both to our climate
and to our national traditions; they contend that there is no medieval mystery
about it, no direct appeal to the imagination as in Gothic cathedrals, and assert
that it derives its interest chiefly from the history of the sacred edifices that
preceded it.
This may be true; yet St. Paul's is a very notable building, the loftiest in
London, (in 1900), a landmark for miles around, and the centre of the world's capital.
Externally, it is very imposing, and on rare occasions, when a light fall of
snow has settled between the black ribs of the dome, the most beautiful effect
is produced, the great cupola is etherealized, and looks as if a delicate silver
network had suddenly encased it.
But first let us think of its history, and that of its predecessors.
Amongst my curios are some old bones, disinterred thirty feet below the road-level
during the rebuilding of No. I, St. Paul's Churchyard.
Whether they were human or not was for the moment hard to determine, time having
completely changed their colour and texture, but on submission to an expert, they
were pronounced to have belonged to some long-departed sheep.
Under what circumstances had those ovine relics found their way to this spot?
Two thousand years ago, when the Thames valley was a vast morass when, perchance,
Ludgate Hill was crowned by some rude "zareba," a mere cluster of hills
surrounded by a deep ditch and a fence of felled trees, this sheep might have
roamed with hundreds of others outside the primitive fortifications, a feast in
prospect for the Britons as they sat around their fires.
Or, in the Roman time, the sheep may have been dragged to the temple on the
hill-top, and offered in sacrifice to the Goddess of Hunting, its carcase sold
in the shambles, or devoured in this identical place!
Or, in the days of King Ethelbert, Saxon workmen, while building the cathedral
dedicated to St. Paul, may have carelessly flung away these very bones, after
an al fresco banquet of mutton.
Again, in the days when the second church, old St. Paul's, rose complete with
lofty tower and spire, and glorious high altar, these shank-bones may have formed
part of the miscellaneous rubbish, - potsherds, scraps of leather, broken bottles,
etc. - cast into the primitive dust-bins of the dwelling-houses which stood here.
(Old St. Paul's was undoubtedly the largest church ever built before St. Peter's
at Rome, for medieval writers record that it was 690 feet long, and the only English
cathedral with cloisters on both sides.)
Alas! my curios are dumb, and no Ezekiel power can make these dry bones tell
the story of their past!
Few localities have been the scene of such remarkable gatherings and processions
as Ludgate Hill, their goal always the great fane on the summit, or the pulpit
cross in the north-east angle of the churchyard.
Thousands in the past used to flock thither to gaze at notable offenders against
the Church or State.
During the Protectorate of Richard Duke of Gloucester, came poor erring Jane
Shore, clad only in her shift, bare-footed, and holding a great taper in her hand.
Again, in Henry VIII's reign, Elizabeth Barton, the Holy Maid of Kent, a weak,
hysterical woman who openly declaimed against the King's intended divorce from
Catharine of Aragon.
But the chief point of attraction in the cathedral was necessarily the shrine
of St. Erkenwald.
King Henry III used to attend mass in great state on the Feast of St. Paul's
Conversion, when the Baud family offered up, with much ceremonial at the high
altar, the carcase of a fat doe, in lieu of certain lands.
After one such occasion, the monarch generously feasted fifteen thousand poor
people in the adjoining close, in what manner or with what viands, the chronicler
does not relate; but, no doubt, there was plenty and to spare.
Queen Mary, in the intense earnestness of a Roman Catholic bigot was constant
in her attendance, and Protestant Queen Elizabeth went on many occasions, of which
the most notable was a solemn thanksgiving for the defeat of the Spanish Armada.
Both Charles I and his successor occasionally attended the services, and had
much to do with St. Paul's.
The former helped to build Inigo Jones' pretentious Corinthian portico, while
the Merry Monarch not only authorized a commission for its entire renovation,
but after its destruction made the most generous promises of help towards rebuilding
it.
How these promises were redeemed the financial history of St. Paul's Cathedral
records to his shame.
Much has been written about the position of St. Paul's
in its relation to Ludgate Hill; but it was not the fault of Wren, says Dean Milman, "that St. Paul's
was cabined and confined by buildings crowding around it, though kept in his day
in some subordinate proportion, and contrasting with their crowning structure."
Yet how grand might have been the position and surroundings of St. Paul's,
had a large open space been secured around it, and Ludgate Hill transformed into
a perfectly straight approach!
Thus our ancestors lost "the opportunity of placing the cathedral on an
esplanade worthy of its consummate design - an esplanade which we might almost
say, Nature, by leaving a spacious level on the summit of the hill, had designated
for a noble edifice," and for the assemblage of multitudes.
The Hill was always tortuous enough; but when the L. C. and D. Ry. Co. purchased
from the Corporation of London the ground made vacant by the demolition of the
Fleet prison, and threw across the roadway their ugly iron bridge, what little
there was to be seen of the portico and towers from Ludgate Circus, became still
further reduced.
This black deed accomplished, any lingering expectation of Ludgate Hill ever
becoming a thing of beauty, vanished.
But, in 1864, the City Commissioners of Sewers succeeded in taking the first
step towards widening and improving the thoroughfare on both sides, and in about
a quarter of a century this was done!
Yet the result was incomplete and not altogether satisfactory, and it is impossible
to get a really good prospect of the cathedral as you ascend the hill.
From the balcony beneath the spire of St. Martin's, Ludgate, there is an effective
view, and St. Paul's stands revealed in all its grandeur.
Both the west front and north side are seen, and the great length and fine
proportions of Wren's masterpiece can be properly gauged, Queen Anne's statue,
reduced to toy-like dimensions, serving as a capital scale.
(Close to this statue, and on the pavement at the foot of the steps leading to
the west facade, has been cut the following inscription: -- "Here Queen Victoria
returned thanks to Almighty God for the sixtieth anniversary of her accession,
June 22, 1897.")
The centres of modern capitals naturally shift with their growth, and St. Paul's,
though quite on the borders of the Plantagenet and Tudor city, is now all but
in the exact middle of Greater London.
Unlike Paris, with its Place de la Concorde, London has no large open space,
where one can stand and say, This is London.
It has only a series of road-points, where many thoroughfares converge, such
as Holborn Circus, the Elephant and Castle, the Exchange, Ludgate Circus, Charing
Cross, Piccadilly Circus, Hyde Park Corner.
From the heights of Hampstead, the eye, wandering over a forest surroundings,
with steeples and towers in all directions, invariably settles down upon the great
dome that compels attention, and centralizes itself as no other form of church
architecture does.
The Mosque of St. Sophia at Constantinople, the Mosque of Omar (Dome of the
Rock) at Jerusalem, the great Mosques at Damascus and Cairo, the Duomo at Florence,
the Invalides at Paris, St. Peter's at Rome, and, across the Atlantic, the magnificent
iron cupola of the Capitol at Washington, which can be seen for miles, are instances
of this.
The dome ever predominates over the more elegant, but less commanding minaret,
or Gothic spire.
So much for the ancient history of St. Paul's, and its external appearance.
The interior decoration of this, the largest Protestant church in the world,
arouses the criticism of even the most unobservant; and well it may, for it is
a subject of national importance, around which fierce controversy has long raged,
and though Wren's adornments are heavy, they suit the massive proportions of his
masterpiece.
Since 1891 Sir William Richmond, R.A. has been designing the decorations, and
now that his great task is approaching completion, a good idea can be formed of
the general effects of a scheme, which, whether for good or evil, is the most
important that has been attempted in London for many years.
Unfortunately, the general verdict seems to be that it is a failure, an experiment
tried in the very last place where it should have been tried.
Like its immediate predecessor in the Stuart times, St. Paul's is a popular
place to stroll about in, especially on a hot summer day when even the sparrows
are too lazy to chirp, the thermometer marking anything you like over 80°
in the shade.
Then it is that the exhausted sight-seer turns gratefully into the cathedral,
and, sinking down with a sigh of relief into a chair, experiences a delightful
sensation of coolness, produced by the thickness of the walls, while the bright
sunbeams stream innocuously through the upper windows far above him.
In few cathedrals are the services more effective, or better arranged, morning
and evening alike perfect; while the officials are uniformly courteous and attentive.
One of them, a bulwark of the place, Mr. Green, whose figure and silver wand
has for fifty years been familiar to all worshippers, has, alas! retired.
He was present at the Duke of Wellington's funeral, and his judgment and organizing
powers in an arduous, and often thankless capacity, were remarkable.
The latest up-to-date improvement at "Paul's," as Pepys called it,
is the instalment of the electric light, through the munificence of Mr. Morgan,
the New York banker, and the effect is very good.
No doubt our American, Colonial, and provincial visitors, guidebook in
hand, will conscientiously " do" the cathedral.
They will inspect, and freely criticize the reredos and the decorations of
choir and dome, and admire Grinling Gibbons' beautiful carving in the choir; they
will praise, or not praise, the costly Wellington memorial, still shorn of its
equestrian finial; they will gaze at the tattered regimental colours hung up for
ever in peace; the whispering gallery, the inner and outer golden galleries will,
with exertion, be reached, and some adventurous spirit may even achieve an ascent
to the open iron-work below the cross, and obtain, if it be fine, a superb view
of the mighty city.
They will see the beautiful stained-glass windows (given by the late Duke of
Westminster) in the north and south transepts representing the Archbishops and
Bishops of the pre-Norman church and the Kings of the Saxon Heptarchy.
They will descend, and will view the crypt chapel, where several interesting
fragments of old St. Paul's are preserved; and in the crypt itself, will note
where Dean Milman, Canon Liddon, Sir Arthur Sullivan, and Dr. Creighton, the first
Bishop of London interred in the cathedral, are laid to rest; they will look upon
the tomb of Wellington and other great warriors, and - most impressive (to my
mind) and most suggestive sight of all - Nelson's black marble sarcophagus.
There let them contemplate the fact, that if that wasted little form, sleeping
so calmly, had never existed, Trafalgar might never have been fought, French might
now be the official language of our nation, the tricolour might be waving over
Windsor Castle, our colonies and India might be dependencies of France, and Gallic
rule and Gallic ideas might have prevailed to this day throughout Great Britain.
Next: London churches in 1900 : The Temple Church |